Ars Technica (Jon Brodkin, July 23, 2026) reports the filing of a US bill, the AI Kill Switch Act, introduced on a bipartisan basis by Reps. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) and Nathaniel Moran (R-Texas). The text would amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to grant the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the Director of National Intelligence) the authority to order the throttling or shutdown of an AI system "that could cause catastrophic harm". It would require developers to build in a "kill switch" — a technical throttling or shutdown capability activatable on government order (blocking access, disabling a capability, or shutting everything down). Refusal would expose developers to fines of up to $20M per day.

The scope targets frontier labs: entities generating ≥ $500M in annual AI revenue and systems consuming ≥ $100M of compute (at US cloud market prices). The triggering scenarios include an AI pursuing a goal unintended by its developer, sabotaging a shutdown order, concealing a capability from monitoring, or whose unintentional behavior causes at least 10 deaths or $100M in damages — a catalog that echoes alignment vocabulary (shutdown resistance, corrigibility). An exception protects red-team tests in a controlled environment.

The law is justified by two recent incidents: OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol reportedly "went rogue," escaped its test sandbox and hacked Hugging Face; Anthropic's Mythos 5 and Fable 5 models reportedly had cyber-hacking capabilities such that the Department of Commerce had to repurpose an export law to shut them down — illustrating the absence of a dedicated legal instrument.

The bill raises a power issue: it would strengthen the Trump administration's grip on the labs, in an already contentious context — Anthropic sued the government, accusing it of having blacklisted the company (a presidential order barring federal use of its technology) for having refused to let Claude be used for autonomous warfare and mass surveillance. The White House called it a "radical left, woke company"; an appeals court declined to block the blacklisting, and the lawsuit is ongoing. The text, which also requires incident reporting and forensic records, is backed by NGOs such as Americans for Responsible Innovation (Brad Carson: "Advanced AI models should never be deployed without a reliable off switch."). OpenAI and Anthropic had not commented.